Synopsis

A lively online debate erupts over returning to the office. One view argues it's a societal need for social cohesion. Others counter that remote work frees energy for genuine community engagement. The discussion reveals differing perspectives on work culture, isolation, and personal fulfillment in modern life.

Employee says people should go to office at least 3 days a week because it’s good for society — sparks debate over remote work
A strong opinion about returning to the office has ignited a lively debate online, highlighting just how divided people remain about remote work. In a recent Reddit post, one employee argued that most people should be working from the office at least three days a week, not because companies demand it, but because society needs it. The post wasn’t framed around corporate profits or commercial real estate. Instead, it focused on what the writer believes is being lost as more people spend their days working from home.

The comment quickly gained traction, with thousands of reactions and replies from people eager to weigh in.

ALSO READ: After two years on the job, new boss says employee isn’t performing — advice pours in, many call it ‘gunny sacking


The Argument: Comfort Isn’t Always Good for Us


The original poster acknowledged the appeal of remote work, no commute, more time with pets, the ability to handle household chores during breaks. But they argued that the growing preference for staying home full-time may not be healthy in the long run.

Their core belief was that constant comfort and convenience are reshaping modern life in ways that aren’t necessarily positive. According to the post, humans are already spending too much time online, and removing the need to physically go anywhere for work only deepens that isolation.

The writer suggested that even if someone can perform their job perfectly well from home, there is value in getting dressed, stepping outside and being physically around others. In their view, regular in-person interaction, even with coworkers one might not personally choose to spend time with, plays a role in maintaining social cohesion.

ALSO READ: Employee resigns after 5 years, so does his colleague. Management suspects a plot to disrupt operations — wise advice follows


The opinion was quite blunt that staying home all week may feel good, but it may not be good for people overall.


The Pushback: Work Isn’t a Substitute for Real Community


The response was swift and, in many cases, critical. Many commenters argued that the issue isn’t remote work — it’s the lack of meaningful “third spaces.” These are social environments outside of home and work, such as gyms, clubs, parks, cafés or hobby groups. Several people said they are more active and socially engaged now that they work from home because they aren’t drained by commuting.


ALSO READ: Employee almost quit for a startup, boss stepped in, decision turned into a blessing - many call manager 'class'

Others pointed out that office interactions don’t automatically equal genuine human connection. For some, workplace relationships are functional rather than fulfilling. They argued that remote work allows them to conserve energy and spend it on friendships, family time, fitness or community involvement.

A recurring theme in the replies was autonomy. Many said that if someone wants to go into the office, they should absolutely be free to do so. But tying social health directly to mandatory office attendance felt misguided to them.

ALSO READ: Word of the Day: Susurration

Some also noted the practical benefits of working from home: lower commuting costs, fewer hours lost in traffic, and more flexibility for errands and personal responsibilities. For these workers, remote jobs have improved their quality of life rather than diminished it.


A Reflection of a Larger Cultural Divide


The exchange reflects a broader cultural tension. As remote work has become more common, so has the conversation about loneliness, digital life and the erosion of shared public spaces.

For some, the office represents structure, routine and spontaneous interaction. For others, it represents exhaustion, forced proximity and lost time.

What’s clear from the Reddit debate is that the question isn’t simply about productivity. It’s about how people define community, fulfillment and balance in a rapidly changing work culture.

The debate over remote work is no longer just about where people log in. It’s about how modern life is structured and what we value as a society. While some believe regular office attendance strengthens social bonds, others see flexibility and personal choice as the real key to well-being.

ALSO READ: Quote of the Day by George Clooney: 'You learn nothing from success…'—inspiring quotes by the famous actor

FAQs


Why did the post gain so much attention?

Because it framed returning to the office as a social responsibility rather than a business necessity, which struck a nerve among remote workers.

Are most remote workers socially isolated?
Based on the reactions, many say no. Commenters shared that they actively socialize outside of work and often feel more energized doing so without a commute.

Contact to : xlf550402@gmail.com


Privacy Agreement

Copyright © boyuanhulian 2020 - 2023. All Right Reserved.