Mumbai: Oscar-winning composer AR Rahman’s recent remarks hinting at possible communal bias in Bollywood have sparked a wider debate within the Hindi film industry, drawing varied reactions from actors, filmmakers and audiences alike. Among those responding is actor Rani Mukerji, who has firmly disagreed with Rahman’s assertion, stating that in her three-decade-long career, she has never witnessed discrimination based on religion or caste and continues to view Bollywood as a secular, merit-based space.

Rahman’s remarks trigger industry-wide discussion

The discussion began after AR Rahman, one of India’s most globally recognised composers, spoke about the changing dynamics within the film industry during an interview with BBC Asian Network. Rahman suggested that decision-making power in Bollywood has increasingly shifted to individuals who are not creatively inclined, which, according to him, may have indirectly influenced hiring practices.

“People who are not creative have the power now to decide things, and this might have been a communal thing also, but not in my face,” Rahman said, adding that such issues often reach him through “Chinese whispers”. He cited instances where he was initially approached for projects, only to later learn that multiple other composers had been hired instead.

While Rahman clarified that these experiences did not affect him personally and that he chose to focus on his work and family, his comments quickly gained traction, reigniting long-standing conversations around inclusivity, representation and transparency in Bollywood’s functioning.

Rani Mukerji’s response: ‘Bollywood is secular’

Responding to Rahman’s comments, Rani Mukerji offered a contrasting perspective based on her personal experience. Speaking to DD News, the actor categorically rejected the notion of communal or religious bias in the Hindi film industry.

“Bollywood is the most secular place, and I truly believe that. There is no discrimination based on caste or religion,” Mukerji said. “In my 30 years in the industry, I have never experienced anything like this. I love this industry – it made me who I am today.”

Mukerji emphasised that merit and audience connection remain the most decisive factors for success in Bollywood. “I am saying this from the bottom of my heart: here, merit matters,” she added.

According to the actor, the industry has historically rewarded talent and hard work, irrespective of background. She stressed that longevity in Bollywood depends on the audience’s acceptance rather than identity or affiliations.

‘Your work speaks for you,’ says Mukerji

Elaborating further, Mukerji noted that cinema ultimately thrives on the relationship between performers and audiences. “Your work speaks for you, and ultimately, the person the audience connects with is the one who survives and succeeds,” she said.

She described Bollywood as “one of the most amazing places to be”, pointing out that its diversity and openness have allowed artists from different regions, cultures and communities to flourish over the decades. Mukerji’s remarks resonated with many industry insiders who believe that while structural challenges exist, the industry at its core remains inclusive.

Rahman clarifies his position

In the aftermath of the controversy, AR Rahman released a video message to clarify his comments and reduce misinterpretation. He underlined that his observations were not meant to single out any community or accuse individuals directly, but rather to highlight how creative decision-making has evolved over time.

Rahman reiterated that his purpose as an artist remains positive and inclusive. He also stressed that music, for him, continues to be a medium of unity rather than division, and that he prefers to focus on creativity rather than speculation or controversy.

A broader conversation on power and inclusivity

The differing views of Rahman and Mukerji underline the complexity of the issue. While some artists feel marginalised or sidelined by changing power structures in the industry, others maintain that Bollywood still largely functions on talent and box office appeal.

Industry observers note that the Hindi film industry has undergone significant transformation in recent years, with corporate studios, streaming platforms and marketing-driven decisions playing a bigger role. These shifts, some argue, have reduced the influence of individual creatives, while others believe they have simply altered the ecosystem.

At the same time, conversations around representation, fairness and access continue to surface, particularly as younger voices question traditional gatekeeping mechanisms. The debate sparked by Rahman’s remarks reflects these evolving concerns rather than a single, clear-cut reality.

Rani Mukerji’s ongoing career

Rani Mukerji, one of Bollywood’s most acclaimed actors, continues to remain active in the industry. She is currently seen in Mardaani 3, reprising her role as a strong, female-led police officer, a character that has become synonymous with her later career.

Her response to Rahman’s comments reinforces her long-held belief in Bollywood’s inclusivity and her gratitude towards an industry she credits for shaping her life and career.

Conclusion

The exchange between AR Rahman’s observations and Rani Mukerji’s rebuttal highlights the diversity of experiences within Bollywood. While Rahman’s remarks have drawn attention to concerns about creative control and possible bias, Mukerji’s account underscores a contrasting narrative of meritocracy and secularism. Together, these perspectives contribute to an ongoing, nuanced conversation about the realities of India’s film industry in a changing cultural and commercial landscape.